Showing posts with label Paint and Materials. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paint and Materials. Show all posts

December 28, 2017

Five Ways to Get the Most Out of Your P&M Calculator

FENDER BENDER MAGAZINE - July 1, 2016 - Anna Zeck 

Rising paint and materials costs have been an issue for years, as insurance reimbursement rates have remained largely flat. According to data from Mitchell, paint and materials made up 10.5 percent of the average appraisal value during Q1 2016, representing a 0.5 increase from Q4 2015. The average paint and materials rate was $33.51 per refinish hour in Q1 2016, compared to $32.91 in Q1 2015.

Repairers commonly report underpayment or no payment for various materials used during repairs. Meanwhile, shops’ costs for those products have increased dramatically over the past decade, causing P&M profit margins to dwindle by the year, says Rick Palmer, president of ComputerLogic.

One way to combat this is by using a paint and materials calculator, such as Mitchell’s RMC, PMCLogic or PaintEx, which allow shops to implement diligent documentation practices and improve insurance negotiation strategies. These software programs help take the guesswork out of P&M accounting, allowing shops to easily document and itemize all materials—from sandpaper to car wash soap to razor blades—to come up with a true cost for refinishing and an itemized invoice of the paint and materials used in a particular repair.

What’s more, systems like PMCLogic integrate with established estimating and paint systems, making generating an accurate P&M estimate easy and quick to do. Estimates for a specific vehicle type, Palmer says, include the amount of paint and materials that are expected to be used based on all of the panels, plus other items repaired or replaced. That system also factors into the equation other special conditions or requirements for each particular job. The result is a price generated from a database of industry information and current prices for the products used.

Ted Williams, manager of business consulting services at Sherwin-Williams, and Rick Palmer, president of ComputerLogic, discuss the top five ways shops should use P&M calculators in the shop.

1) Use the reports as a guide.

After inputting the information into the P&M calculator system, Williams suggests using the report as a guide throughout the repair process. He says that shops he works with will even print out a copy and put it on the window of the car.

“When a technician looks at it, they can use it as a guide,” Williams says. “‘Based on the repair that we’ve got, they’re saying we should use three sheets of this grit sandpaper.’ They can guide themselves. If they use five sheets, they know they used too much. They know what to shoot for as far as the amount of materials.”

Some shops even create job packs of product to put on the repair cart at the beginning of the repair based on that printout. For example, if the invoice says the repair should use three sheets of 180 grit sandpaper, the shop will get three sheets of 180 grit and store it on the cart. Williams says this ensures that technicians don’t use too much, and if they need more, they can easily record this in the system and can note the reason for needing more.

2) Negotiate more effectively with insurance companies.

Williams says that above all, the benefit of a P&M calculator is that it is a tool for negotiating with insurers regarding reimbursement, which is something that Williams says many shops struggle with.
“They have to go into it with the right mindset,” he says. “They have to have the data and they have to talk about the data in a way to negotiate to get more materials.”

Williams says that the P&M calculator acts as documentation and should be used to prove to insurance companies everything that was needed to provide a quality repair for their policyholders.
“These systems clearly put materials usage in black and white,” he says. “The documentation details all of the expenses and provides logical explanations of the costs. And that’s what helps shops get reimbursed from insurance companies.”

One reason is because it provides adjusters with an argument to use when speaking with their supervisors. They’re able to explain why certain items were needed, and why they allowed the shop to exceed the P&M cap, Williams says.

“Insurers tend to side with shops more often when repairers can provide this type of documentation,” Williams says. “It doesn’t guarantee proper reimbursement, but it certainly helps you and will get you a lot more than not using it.”

Before negotiating, Williams suggests being as accurate as you can with the documentation and deciding beforehand what your minimum is.

“You can sit here and do the material calculator and it will tell you that you have $900 worth of materials and the material cap was $450. At what point are you going to be satisfied?” he says. “Are you going to fight for the full $900 or are you going to be satisfied with the negotiation if the insurance company decides to give you $700? You’ve still dramatically increased your material margin.”

3) Involve your jobber to speed up restocking orders.

One of the benefits of P&M calculators is that they interface with multiple systems, such as paint, estimating and vendor systems. This makes it easier to integrate multiple processes in the system, as well as get your jobber involved in the process. Palmer says that by allowing jobbers access to the system, they can rely on the information for reordering and purchasing.

“The jobber doesn’t have to go to the shop every week and count inventory,” he says. “They only have to go out twice a month. Either the shop can generate the purchase order for restocking from the system or the jobber can do it himself. They have their own login and can create a purchase order for the shop.” Palmer says allowing jobbers access to the P&M system ensures that they are ordering the correct amount of materials for the shop based on prior usage, meaning the shop doesn’t end up with an excess of inventory or too little with frequent restocking.

4) Bring the painters and technicians up front during the damage analysis.

Williams says that the key to using P&M calculators effectively is being accurate from the very beginning. One way to do that, he says, is by getting your experienced body technicians and painters involved in the damage analysis.

“They can tell you, based on experience, here’s how many tubes of adhesive and different things you’re going to need for that repair,” he says. “You can add to the initial invoice at the very beginning. I find even with the best shops, they’re not doing this and bringing the painter up to the front.”

Williams says to have the painter and technician review the estimate for estimate accuracy, verify the actual color, get the color match up front and have the technician map out any repair panels.
“What I’ve found is that typically by bringing the paint tech up there, we’re going to get more accurate estimates right out the gate as far as the right amount of hours, we capture materials that we probably aren’t getting paid for right now and we can do it at the beginning of the repair process,” he says.

5) Use the data as KPI reports to reduce waste.

Palmer says that in his experience, when shops embark on using paint and material calculators, they explore details of their materials costs that may have been overlooked before. And while the biggest gains in P&M profitability generally come from stronger sales and capturing all needed processes and procedures, there are gains to be made by measuring and managing your costs. That means that the shop is better able to track its P&M usage and reduce waste.

“How many sheets of sandpaper should they be using? For the last 90 days, according to what was used on that car, you should’ve used 5.5 boxes of sandpaper. You bought 10 boxes. I need to look into that,” he says. “They’ll say, ‘I got paid X dollars for paint and materials.’ We’d say, based on your actual cost factors, this is what you should have gotten back.”

If there are discrepancies in that data, Palmer says that you need to take a closer look and figure out where the shop is experiencing significant waste and the reasons for that. He says that common reasons include employees taking a can or two of materials for personal use, painters mixing too much paint, or simply incorrect cost accounting.





February 11, 2016

Disruptive Technology in the Collision Industry

Disruptive Technology

Harvard Business School professor Clayton Christensen coined the term ”disruptive technology” in his 1997 best-selling book, "The Innovator's Dilemma.“


A disruptive technology is one that:
1) displaces an established technology and shakes up the industry, or 
2) is a ground-breaking product that creates a completely new industry.

                             Here are some examples of ‘disruptive technology’
PC - Personal computer displaced the typewriter. It forever changed the way we work.

Email - Transformed the way we communicate.  It largely displacing letter-writing and disrupted the postal and greeting card industries.

Cell Phone - Made it possible for people to call us anywhere, and disrupted the telecom industry.

Laptop and mobile computing - made a mobile workforce possible.

Cloud computing - has been a hugely disruptive technology in the business world.  It is displacing many resources that previously were located in-house.

__________________________________________

 Why is PMCLogic a disruptive technology?

                                                       
Because it changes the way repairers get paid for P&M’s!

Currently repairers are pay for paint and materials on an arbitrarily and flawed methodology based on ‘refinish labor hours’ times a fixed dollar “allowance amount”.  This method of calculating what is due for each and every unique repair is universally recognized as being outdated, inaccurate and totally inequitable.

Why does this flawed methodology continue to be used?  Because until now it has been virtually impossible for a shop to accurately account of the exact amount of paint and materials used on a specific/unique repair.

What has changed?  New technology developed by ComputerLogic, and delivered via their PMCLogic™ Paint and Materials Management System, automatically generates an extremely accurate predictive estimate of the list and quantities of all P&M items that will be needed for each unique repair.  In addition, it interfaces with paint mixing systems to validate how much paint was ultimately used on each repair to insure that the final invoice accurately reflects an honest account of what P&M’s were used for a each specific repair.

Keys to success for ‘Disruptive Technology’:
It solves a problem or satisfies a need better, faster, easier and/or cheaper.

PMCLogic meets all of these criteria.
PMCLogic is better because it generates an extremely accurate predictive estimate of exactly what P&M’s will be used on each unique repair.

It is better because a repairer can easy turn that predictive estimate into a final accurate invoice.  This is because PMCLogic interfaces with numerous other applications that account for or measure the actual volume of paint and materials used for that specific job.

It is better because it automatically notifies the estimator of the P&M items that can be entered as a manual line item on the original vehicle estimate and shown as a ‘parts item’ for supplement payment.

It is better because it captures a ton of information for reporting purposes, such as, job costing, gross profit margin for all jobs paid by a specific insurance company, detailed material usage by SKU, lost opportunity, KPI’s, and more…

It is fast and easy to because it interfaces with all of the estimating systems (Audatex, CCC, Mitchell, Comp-Est and Web-Est) which eliminates the need to re-enter data.

It is cheaper because it pays for itself on just one job per month.  All other money generated and/or saved by using PMCLogic is additional net profit to the shop.



For more information on PMCLogic™ and request a ‘Free Trial’




January 11, 2016

An industry challenge for the New Year


January 1, 2016
A NEW YEAR'S RESOLUTION
An industry challenge for the New Year

The new year is exciting for me because it really motivates me to reflect, evaluate and establish a refreshed and reinvigorated resolve in my daily routine (which has become anything but routine).
As I look at the collision repair industry—an industry to which I've devoted my entire career—I'm discovering that what I'm doing every day can't really be called a "job." For me it has become a very personal way of life. And because of this everyday personal relationship I have with the industry, I find myself constantly evaluating the industry's ongoing progress and the many outside resources that help to create an improved customer experience that enhances the overall perception of our business.
Part of that evaluation involves cleaning up "standard procedure" facets of the business that have been around forever but, today, don't seem to make too much sense.
One of those facets is paint and material (P&M) invoicing, which has been a thorn in the industry's side seemingly since the beginning of time. We've forever relied on a "best-guess" number that is derived from a fixed dollar amount multiplied by the refinish labor hours to determine P&M costs, simply because we've had no better way of tracking specific materials to the specific vehicle that was being invoiced.
I'm sure you'll agree with me that P&M invoicing using this method has always been a "You win some, you lose some" notion that (we hope) will even out in the long run. Hear me when I tell you that this archaic costing measure is a "lose-lose-lose" proposition! It's not fair to the customer, it's not fair to the insurer and it's definitely not fair to your bottom line.
Thankfully, today we have a much more sophisticated and accurate method of determining these costs in the variety of material calculators available that allows us to identify those line-item materials that are specific to each repair.
And these material calculators couldn't have been developed at a better time, since the vast amount of job-specific materials are increasing at an incredible rate.
Material calculators provide a detailed list of what was used to repair the vehicle, which leads to a more accurate invoice, which improves the customer perception of your work, while ultimately helping to reduce waste in the shop.
So if this technology tool is so great, then why isn't every shop in the universe using it? That question is so intriguing; I'm going to follow it up with a few more thought-provoking queries that hopefully challenges your thinking for the coming year:
Can we continue to operate as a viable industry knowing that we're overcharging and/or undercharging for P&M, hoping it will somehow work out over the long haul?
Don’t our customers deserve to be accurately invoiced for materials being applied to their vehicle?
Aren’t loss costs supposed to be directly associated with that specific vehicle's loss?
Is there a mistrust or suspicion of the validity of material calculators that I'm not aware of? Or is it just that we really don't understand them (or just don't believe them)?
How in the world can we as industry still be so committed to the status quo and archaic methodology when technology enables us to identify, calculate and invoice the material specific to the job?
Materials are specific and unique to each and every job. As professionals, we must invoice with the intention of accuracy and integrity. My "type-A" personality, for one, can't comprehend it any other way.
In this new year we need to resolve to find the collective courage to seek out better ways to do our job, serve our customers and create change. If you have any ideas on the answers to the questions I've posed above, or want to boast about how P&M material calculators have affected the way you do business, feel free to let me know. 
Michael Giarrizzo, Jr.
President & CEO

Michael Giarrizzo Jr. is president and CEO of DCR Systems, which develops on-site accident repair facilities for auto dealers nationwide seeking to outsource this function as an additional fixed operation while preserving financial and customer benefits. Giarrizzo was formally vice president and chief operating officer of Sterling Auto Body Centers, where he led operations of more than 1,300 people across 10 states. Giarrizzo was instrumental in growing the company to 65 stores, developing 5 greenfield locations and transitioning 39 existing stores from traditional one-technician, multiple-car thinking to a true process flow environment, directing focus to cycle time, quality and market competitiveness. Prior to assuming the COO role with Sterling, Michael served as regional director in charge of the Cleveland and Akron markets. Before that, Giarrizzo helped to grow his family’s Cleveland-based JSI Collision Centers from a single location to a four-store chain in Northeastern Ohio with annual sales of $12 million. JSI was twice recognized by the industry as “Collision Business of the Year” for its customer service and standardized operating procedures and was acquired in 1999 by Sterling Autobody Centers. Giarrizzo holds a business administration degree in marketing from St. Bonaventure University.


*Article originally published in ABRN on Jan. 1st, 2016.  Direct link to article published in ABRN is HERE

September 10, 2014

PMCLogic Checklist

Did you know?

PMCLogic has a printable 'Checklist'?  

Our customers say it helps in several ways.  This is the workflow.  They write their estimate in CCC, Mitchell, Audatex or CompEst and export it into PMCLogic.  Then print out the 'checklist' from PMCLogic, and right away that goes in the job jacket.   This does several things:

1) You now have a very detailed list of what was actually used to repair that vehicle to pre-accident condition.  You now have credibility to show what is on that invoice.

2) Helps make the invoice that much more accurate and easily updates to exact usage of materials.

3)Helps reduce waste, now repairers have a list of how much they should be using on repairs.  



March 6, 2014

Why Does The Collision Industry Still Use Dollars Time Hours To Calculate P&M Cost?

If virtually everyone in the collision repair industry agrees that the prevailing method for paying for paint and materials (P&M’s), based on a fixed dollar amount times the refinish hours, is not “fair” to at least one of the two parties involved; why does this practice continue?

We’ll look at the three most frequently mentioned reasons why the industry has not already moved to a more equitable payment system, such as INVOICING; and examine why these constraints are no longer valid.
1. It’s not easy for shops to document what P&M’s were actually used for a specific vehicle repair.  This is the first reason usually given.  That premise may have been valid many years ago, but is not true today.
 Almost all shops today mix their paint and other liquids on a paint system smart-scale.  These systems provide a cost and sell report for each mix, based on the unique vehicle color.  With this information a shop is already half way home towards creating a very accurate final invoice for their P&M’s.
Gathering accurate information on the materials used, however, takes a little more effort; but this too can be done quickly and easily.  There are several P&M estimating systems on the market today that provide a shop with a list of materials (sometimes called ‘dry goods’) that are predicted to be used for a specific job.
If the shop will print out that ‘materials check list’ and place it in the travel jacket that goes along with the vehicle throughout the repair process, when the repair is completed the tech who worked on that vehicle can take a couple of minutes to look over that list of line items for accuracy and note any necessary adjustments that need to be made.  Next, make any necessary changes (adds, edits, and deletes) on the P&M invoicing program and generate an accurate ‘final list’, or invoice, of all of the paint and materials used on a specific vehicle repair.  Then, present it to the vehicle owner (customer) and their insurer for payment.
2. The feeling that no matter what the shops do, the insurance companies will not change the way they pay for P&M’s.  This assumption is also false.  Henry Ford once said, “The man who thinks he can, and the man who thinks he can't; are both usually right.” Which one are you?
Today, thousands of shops are regularly being paid off of paint and material INVOICES because they have taken the ‘high road’ and have done ‘the right thing’ for ‘the right reason’ and they are doing it ‘the ‘right way’.
Changing the way one has done business over many years is not an instant occurrence; it is a journey.  It takes patience and persistence to effectuate change.  In addition, it takes three key components to be successful; (1) willing people, (2) a plan of action and (3) the right tools.
Willing people are those who have a positive attitude, believe there is a need for change, and are disciplined enough to stay the course.  A plan of action outlines how one will get from where they are to where they what to go.  And, the proper tools should help make the task as easy as possible
3. People and companies have a built-in adversity to change.   This is true, but it does not make it right.  Everything is constantly changing; and those people or businesses that do not embrace change will not be around in the future.
 “Repairers must first change the way they do business, if they expect to change the way insurers do business with them.”  This truism covers all aspects of the collision repair industry and the repairer/insurer business relationship.  It is clearly applicable when it comes to changing the way repairer’s currently get paid for paint and materials (P&M’s).
Getting paid equitably for paint and materials is a four step process.

     First, shops need to know their true cost of P&M’s based on an accurate accounting of what was used to repair each and every vehicle that goes through their shop.
     Second, with correct information at their disposal, they can more accurately establish the selling price needed on each job to generate the expected gross profits they desire.
    Third, they need an easy way to document the items that are to be invoiced.
    Forth, they need to ask for the sale!

June 7, 2013

PMCLogic Customer Survey


We recently, in the last few weeks, sent out a survey to all our PMCLogic customers.  The feedback we received was fantastic, and we gained a lot of valuable information.  We want to post some the responses to our survey with you. Here are a few of the results to the survey:

Results of the survey revealed that the top 5 insurance companies who pay off of PMCLogic invoices are:
1)  GEICO
2)  Allstate
3)  Progressive
4)  Farmers
5)  USAA

Other interesting information from the survey shows how much additional revenue shops are making on the average, per job, by using PMCLogic :
52% get paid an additional $51 to $150, per repair
38% get paid an additional $151 to $250, per repair
5% get paid an additional $250 or more, per repair
5% get paid  around $50, or less, per repair

We want you too to be one of our happy customers.  Contact us for a free PMCLogic trial.  
800.933.6564